← Market Flow Research 🌙
Про проект

About Market Research Lab — What We Collect and Why

Most market commentary is storytelling. We built something testable instead: 166 days of second-by-second order-book data across six coins, and a rule that nothing gets published unless it survives out-of-sample.

Research note · 2026 · AI-assisted, human-reviewed

Full walkthrough — streamed from YouTube.

① What we collect

Every second, around the clock, we record the Binance order book for six pairs — BTC, ETH, SOL, BNB, XRP and DOGE. For each pair we store eight microstructure features plus price: the resting buy and sell walls, how those walls thicken and thin out, and the raw buy/sell volume hitting them. The collector has been running non-stop since 14 February 2026; the archive is now 166 trading days and more than 11 million second-by-second rows per coin — roughly 60 million rows in total, growing every day.

Average buy vs sell volume per coin across the whole archive
Average buy vs sell volume per coin across the whole archive

② Why we do it

Most crypto commentary is storytelling: a chart, a narrative, no way to check it. We wanted the opposite — claims small enough to be measured and specific enough to be wrong. Every statement we publish has a number behind it, a sample size, and a test on data the model never saw. If a claim can't survive that, it doesn't get published here. That includes our own favourite ideas: several of them died in testing, and we say so.

③ How we dig

First we build baselines: what counts as 'normal' for this coin at this timeframe. Turnover per second is tiny; aggregate to minutes, hours and days and it grows by orders of magnitude, so a 'spike' only means anything relative to its own window — never as an absolute number. On top of those baselines we build feature profiles, a market-state oscillator, autocorrelation and event studies around unusual order-book behaviour. Predictions are written down first and scored later. No moving the goalposts.

Normal turnover by timeframe for BTC, log scale
Normal turnover by timeframe for BTC, log scale

④ What we test

Three lines of work. Volatility forecasts built from order-book flow. A market-state oscillator that reads the tape's temperature. And trading bots — always walk-forward, always benchmarked against simple buy & hold, priced with a realistic 0.15% fee per action, with take-profit deliberately smaller than stop-loss. Live paper bots run a champion-versus-challenger tournament: a fresh candidate is trained after every closed trade and only replaces the incumbent if it actually scores better.

Correlation of order-book flow with the size of the next move, by horizon
Correlation of order-book flow with the size of the next move, by horizon

⑤ What we've learned: size is forecastable

Order-book flow predicts how big the next move will be. Rank correlation runs around 0.55 in the moment and roughly 0.25–0.30 five minutes ahead — consistently, on all six coins. The cleanest validated pattern is the wall that drains: when resting liquidity is pulled without being replaced, the following window runs ×1.4–1.6 more volatile than usual, while a thick untouched wall precedes calm (×0.84–0.94). The edge is real but short-lived: strong in minutes, essentially gone by a day.

Buy-sell coupling and the forward-volatility forecast
Buy-sell coupling and the forward-volatility forecast

⑥ What we've learned: direction is not

The same data says almost nothing about which way. Forward directional correlation is about zero by every method we tried — imbalance sweeps top out near ρ≈0.2 on BTC and ETH and collapse to zero on SOL, XRP and DOGE. Every purely directional strategy we tested lost out-of-sample: momentum, intraday, move-start detection, fade-the-turbulence. Gross edge came in below the round-trip fee, which is the honest way of saying there was no edge. So we forecast risk, not a guessed side.

Signed correlation of order-flow imbalance with price direction
Signed correlation of order-flow imbalance with price direction

⑦ Our promise

The moment a strategy shows a positive, validated, out-of-sample result, it gets published here — the method, the numbers and the caveats, including the ones that hurt. Until then we keep digging in the open: each study becomes an article with its charts, and every chart is reproducible from the archive. Data collection, analysis, charts and narration are produced with AI assistance and reviewed by a human before anything goes out.

🤖 This research — data collection, analysis, charts and the narrated video — was produced with the assistance of AI, then reviewed by a human. We forecast volatility, not direction, and log every prediction. Research, not financial advice.

Comments

Discussion is powered by GitHub. Enable it by adding secrets/giscus.json (repo IDs from giscus.app).

← All research